Review: a winning trade — what was done right and what wasn't
Short version for experts: tables, lists and screenshots only.
Words in this lesson (7)
The trade
A demo account, a short on the OGN coin.
| Entry | short at 0.042182, a limit order, size about $1,000 |
| Stop | 0.05018 — was in the order from the very start |
| Target | 0.02716 — was in the order from the very start |
| Exit | manually at 0.038359 after 2 h 30 min |
| Result | +$90.13 (+9.1%) |
What was done right
1. The stop and target were set before entry. Out of twelve manual trades, only two had the stop and target in the entry order. One closed at the stop with a small loss of $7.67, the other is this one, the most profitable. It's no coincidence: when the levels are defined in advance, the decision is made with a cool head.
2. The profit was taken manually when the move stopped. The target was still far away, but +9% in two and a half hours is a strong move. Taking it is a sound decision.
What was done wrong
The stop was too far away. From the entry of 0.042182 to the stop of 0.05018 is 19%. With a $1,000 size that's a $190 risk.
Let's count:
- risk — $190;
- received — $90;
- so the trade brought less than half of what was risked.
Had the stop been hit, this one trade would have taken almost 10% of a $2,000 account. The one percent rule allows a $20 risk.
How it should have been. The same 19% stop, a $20 risk → size = 20 ÷ 0.19 = $105, not $1,000. Or the same size, but a stop 2% from the entry.
The takeaway
Check yourself
- What's the position size with a $20 risk and a stop 4% from the entry?
- What was the planned reward-to-risk ratio in this trade (target 0.02716, stop 0.05018)?
- Why can't you judge a trade by its result alone?
Ask the mentor for the answers — it will check your math.
▶ The "Risk" lesson ↗ Open "Terminal" in MAMAY
